There is no better depiction of the duality of man than the two paths that a lever gun can take in the modern year of 2025. The yin and the yang.
On one hand, you can go absolutely timeless — wood everything, open sights, and bluing. Things that have made up the timeless lever gun aesthetic for well over 120 years. These are still alive and well; in fact, at SHOT Show this year, Winchester had a wall full of Model 94s of these ilk.
On the other hand, the industry has come up with myriad modern solutions for modern problems. Full pic rails, M-Lok handguards, synthetic stocks, and whatever-coated finished that allegedly keep the rust at bay far better than traditional bluing (although I’ve never had anything other than stellar results using Ballistol on my blued guns)
Is there a correct path for the contemporary lever gun enthusiast? No — in an ideal world, we would all own both.
If I had to have only one, I’d pick the classics. I’m a traditionalist at heart — wood, Ford’s vanadium steel, vinyl, 1911s, carburetors, women-that-don’t-have-dicks kind of guy. The classics are what your grandkids are going to be throwing down over back at the house after they lower you into the cold, cold ground.
Of course, you give up a bit of practical usability with these kinds of setups. I know iron sights are cool, but I can’t hit a javelina at 150 yards them. That’s really all I need. Not suppressors, rails, lasers, flashlights, or anything else. Just a nice, lightly-updated gun to go pop those piggies once a year.
The Test Bed
This is a special gun to me, because it’s not even mine. I am the current caretaker of my dad’s 1969 Model 94, naturally chambered in .30-30. This is the family heirloom. It also deserves to be used as much as possible, so he carries on our annual hunting trip each year.
It shoots under 1.5 MOA with a 150gr Interlock and the classic book load of 30 grains of IMR 3031.
While she gets used, I’m also not going to do any tapping and drilling and so forth. Everything should be 100% reversible, and the Pearson’s product is a good answer to this particular question.
Long-Term Review of the Pearson’s No-Drill Tac Rail
I installed this rail way back in 2020 and topped it with the Vortex Crossfire II 2-7x scout scope (obviously the long eye relief scopes are needed on the 94s due to the ejection of spent cases from the top of the receiver). The Vortex scope works well, zeros well, and has held up in the field so far. Unfortunately, it also seems to weigh about the same as the rifle itself. It’s still not a heavy package, but the extra weight is noticeable and is just the nature of the beast.
Another great option would be Leupold VX-Freedom 1.5-4x, which is made in the USA, unlike the Vortex. It is also lighter, at 9.6oz versus 12oz for the Vortex. You could also, of course, run any red dot or holographic sight on this as well. Something like the Aimpoint ACRO would be the business if you don’t need magnification, and would also cut down substantially on weight.
I installed it per the manufacturer’s directions and have had no issues, which certainly sounds like something that is too good to be true for a product of this nature. It’s been up to Idaho in sub-zero conditions and out in the Sonoran during javelina season I have not experienced a failure or mechanical issue yet.
This is not an aesthetic improvement, which is a tradeoff that I’m willing to make for the sake of, you know… using it. If you have an old gun like this — or even one of the newer Winchesters that you don’t want to irreversably booger up — the modest buy-in for this rail system is worth the price.
I might go back to more traditional iron sights at some point; a ghost ring, something like the Lyman 66A (I’m also open to recommendations), would be the business and keep it looking great, too. For now, my dad and I enjoy the practical benefits of using and hunting with a scope on his old Winchester and knowing full well we can go back to the way he grew up with it whenever we want.
1 comment
Comments are closed.